Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stmany years peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described mujeres LebanГ©s in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Weightloss discipline is actually mentioned by Slimming down Scale of your Eating Attitudes Take to (EAT) (Garner, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), made up of sixteen comments scored to the a 6-point size (never = 0/always = 5), which have highest results demonstrating an advanced away from restrained dinner. Into Eat psychometrical features look for Garner et al. (1982). The fresh new feel coefficient for both samples, the newest North american country and you will German of those, is actually of the same value, a leader off 0.76.
Losing weight discipline
Ineffectiveness scale. New bad apply at factor is estimated from the Ineffectiveness Level regarding the brand new Food Problems List (EDI) (Gather ainsi que al., 1983), which has shown a good convergent authenticity (ineffectiveness/self confidence ) away from Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Scientific staff got the extra weight and peak strategies
Body mass index (BMI). Bmi are calculated as the pounds during the kilograms divided from the peak during the square yards (Bmi = kg/m2).
Just before analysis range, good airplane pilot study of the fresh Silhouettes Level (Contour step 1), put on a sample comprising 20 Mexican students, was utilized to check on the new appropriateness of the data so you’re able to represent human body products, to corroborate an excellent acceptation away from an as yet not known gang of silhouettes and you can a definite knowledge of the fresh information (new German group already mentioned which have research within value). The outcome showed this new Silhouette Measure is a good or a keen suitable instrument for the Mexican test.
The fresh investigators of the two regions, on Mexico City as well as Hae (standardized) processes. This new questionnaires was put on categories of scientific and you may medical college students on North american country and German universities. A primary reason behind the new ples regarding people pertaining to medication is only the attract one to (you can assume) such young adults need for the scientific field as well as health problems, causing them to alot more tuned in to difficulties instance ED. Advised consent is obtained from all of the investigation participants. All the called students accessible to engage. The latest respective local stability committees acknowledged the latest low-intrusive processes. Top-notch translators undertook and you can regulated the translation and you can retranslation of your instruments.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for