Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Ties certainly lover personality trait resemblance, relationship onset, matchmaking quality, and you will like. [ Links ]
Baxter, L. An excellent., & Western, L. (2003). Pair thinking of the similarities and you will differences: An excellent dialectical direction. Diary regarding Personal and you will Public Relationship, 20, 491-514. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, E. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you will feelings. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible dating (pp. 143-161). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, Age., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Actual attractiveness and you may relationships options: A test of your own coordinating hypothesis. Log of Fresh Personal Psychology, 7, 173-189. [ Website links ]
Diary off Personal and private Dating, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, Age., & Regan, P. (2005). Brand new therapy out of social relationship. Top Seat River, NJ: Pearson Knowledge (Prentice Hallway). [ Hyperlinks ]
Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Activity performance and you can attributional correspondence since the determinants of social attraction. Message Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Hyperlinks ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Destination and you will intimate dating. Inside the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The latest manual off personal mindset (Vol. 2, next ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Slope. [ Links ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, Can get eleven). U.S. Patent six,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Backlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, The fall of. 18). U.S. Patent eight,454,357B2. Arizona, DC. [ Website links ]
Buss, D. Meters. (1984). Marital range getting identification dispositions: Testing which have about three some other studies offer. Decisions Family genes, fourteen, 111-123. [ Backlinks ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude of negative and positive reinforcements just like the a great determinant of appeal. Log away from Personality and Societal Psychology, 2, 884-889. [ Website links ]
Carter, S. Roentgen. (2005, Feb.), Getting modern-time Cupids, study changes relationship: Psychological research was about the brand new effective suits produced during the eHarmony. Organization for Psychological Technology Observer, 18. Downloaded regarding [ Website links ]
Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Enhancing mate options through the internet: A comparison from dating high quality between marriages as a result of an internet dating system and marriage ceremonies arising from unfettered solutions. Interpersona: An international Diary into the Individual Relationships, step 3, 105-125. [ Website links ]
Carter, S., & Snowfall, C. (2004, May). Enabling american singles enter greatest marriage ceremonies playing with predictive types of marital achievement. Papers shown at the 16th Yearly Seminar of your own American Emotional Community. [ Website links ]
Approach and you can program to own distinguishing those people who are gonna keeps a flourishing relationship
C). How does identification count in the ination away from trait nervousness, negativity, and you will marital fulfillment. Log from Identity and Personal Therapy, 78, 326-336. [ Website links ]
Clark, Meters. S. (1985). Implications of matchmaking types of to possess wisdom compatibility. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will in conflict dating (pp. 119-140). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex differences in relationship ambition and fulfillment having desktop-setup couples. Log regarding ily, 28, 62-66. [ Backlinks ]
Cooper, A good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Romance on the net: Wisdom on the web appeal. Journal from Sex Knowledge and you will Procedures, twenty-two, 7-fourteen. [ Backlinks ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Do some body know what they need: The same otherwise subservient partner? Evolutionary Mindset, six, 595-602. [ Website links ]
Feingold, A beneficial. (1988). Matching for attractiveness for the romantic lovers and same-sex household members: An excellent meta-study and you may theoretic complaints. Mental Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Of attractive to terrible: Disenchantment which have a romantic spouse. lovingwomen.org webbplats Sociological Views, 49, 263-280. [ Links ]